Seeing Double: Assessing Kendall Walton’s Views on Painting and Photography

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I consider Kendall Walton’s provocative views on the visual arts, including his approaches to understanding both figurative and nonfigurative painting. I introduce his central notion of fictionality, illustrating its advantages in explaining the phenomenon of ‘perceptual twofoldness’. I argue that Walton’s position treats abstract artwork reductively, and I outline two essential components of our aesthetic encounters with the nonfigurative that Walton excludes. I then offer some criticisms of his commitment to photographic realism, emphasising its theoretical inconsistencies with his account of representation. My own proposal is that in our apprehension of non-figurative artworks, our attention is drawn to the underlying structures of both emotive and perceptual experience. In this way, paintings, particularly abstract ones, disclose human cognition in a manner that makes fictionality an inappropriate tool for their analysis.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RIDSDA
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-20

Total views
35 ( #47,989 of 52,687 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #27,988 of 52,687 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.