An ecumenical response to color contrast cases

Synthese 194 (5) (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Intrapersonal variation due to color contrast effects has been used to argue against the following intuitive propositions about the colors: No object can be more than one determinable or determinate color of the same grade all over at the same time ; external objects are actually colored ; and the colors of objects are mind-independent. In this article, I provide a defense of Incompatibility, Realism, and Objectivism from intrapersonal variation arguments that rely on color contrast effects. I provide a novel, ecumenical response to such arguments according to which typical variants are right, and which respects Incompatibility, Realism, and Objectivism, using the thesis that the colors of objects depend on the colors of objects in their surrounds.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROBAER-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-03

Total views
227 ( #12,327 of 38,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #9,212 of 38,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.