Is Normative Uncertainty Irrelevant if Your Descriptive Uncertainty Depends on It?

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (4):874-899 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


According to ‘Excluders’, descriptive uncertainty – but not normative uncertainty – matters to what we ought to do. Recently, several authors have argued that those wishing to treat normative uncertainty differently from descriptive uncertainty face a dependence problem because one's descriptive uncertainty can depend on one's normative uncertainty. The aim of this paper is to determine whether the phenomenon of dependence poses a decisive problem for Excluders. I argue that existing arguments fail to show this, and that, while stronger ones can be found, Excluders can escape them.

Author's Profile

Pamela Robinson
University of British Columbia, Okanagan


Added to PP

641 (#24,834)

6 months
221 (#11,538)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?