Can A Coherentist Be An Externalist?

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):269-280 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is standard practice, when distinguishing between the foundationalist and the coherentist, to construe the coherentist as an internalist. The coherentist, the construal goes, says that justification is solely a matter of coherence, and that coherence, in turn, is solely a matter of internal relations between beliefs. The coherentist, so construed, is an internalist (in the sense I have in mind) in that the coherentist, so construed, says that whether a belief is justified hinges solely on what the subject is like mentally. I argue that this practice is fundamentally misguided, by arguing that the foundationalism / coherentism debate and the internalism / externalism debate are about two very different things, so that there is nothing, qua coherentist, precluding the coherentist from siding with the externalist. I then argue that this spells trouble for two of the three most pressing and widely known objections to coherentism: the Alternative-Systems Objection and the Isolation Objection
ISBN(s)
1333-1108
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROCCAC
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-12-01

Total views
747 ( #5,661 of 55,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
104 ( #5,760 of 55,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.