Hume on Laws and Miracles

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Hume famously argues that the laws of nature provide us with decisive reason to believe that any testimony of a miracle is false. In this paper, I argue that the laws of nature, as such, give us no reason at all to believe that the testimony of a miracle is false. I first argue that Hume’s proof is unsuccessful if we assume the Humean view of laws, and then I argue that Hume’s proof is unsuccessful even if we assume the governing view of laws. I conclude that regardless of which kind of view we adopt, the fact that a miracle is a violation of the laws of nature does not give us any reason to believe it did not happen.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-09-20
Latest version: 2 (2021-01-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
207 ( #28,006 of 2,439,303 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #23,093 of 2,439,303 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.