Modal Epistemology, Modal Concepts and the Integration Challenge

Dialectica 64 (3):335-361 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper argues against Peacocke's moderate rationalism in modality. In the first part, I show, by identifying an argumentative gap in its epistemology, that Peacocke's account has not met the Integration Challenge. I then argue that we should modify the account's metaphysics of modal concepts in order to avoid implausible consequences with regards to their possession conditions. This modification generates no extra explanatory gap. Yet, once the minimal modification that avoids those implausible consequences is made, the resulting account cannot support Peacocke's moderate rationalism
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROCMEM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 57 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lowe on Modal Knowledge.Horvath, Joachim
Ought to Is: The Puzzle of Moral Science.Basl, John & Coons, Christian

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-09-21

Total views
562 ( #6,958 of 50,155 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,623 of 50,155 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.