Discrimination-Conduciveness and Observation Selection Effects

Philosophers' Imprint 19:1-26 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We conceptualize observation selection effects (OSEs) by considering how a shift from one process of observation to another affects discrimination-conduciveness, by which we mean the degree to which possible observations discriminate between hypotheses, given the observation process at work. OSEs in this sense come in degrees and are causal, where the cause is the shift in process, and the effect is a change in degree of discrimination-conduciveness. We contrast our understanding of OSEs with others that have appeared in the literature. After describing conditions of adequacy that an acceptable measure of degree of discrimination-conduciveness must satisfy, we use those conditions of adequacy to evaluate several possible measures. We also discuss how the effect of shifting from one observation process to another might be measured. We apply our framework to several examples, including the ravens paradox and the phenomenon of publication bias.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROCOSE
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-07-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-07-13

Total views
72 ( #38,324 of 51,278 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,457 of 51,278 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.