Evidence, Judgment, and Belief at Will

Mind 128 (511):837-859 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Doxastic involuntarists have paid insufficient attention to two debates in contemporary epistemology: the permissivism debate and the debate over norms of assertion and belief. In combination, these debates highlight a conception of belief on which, if you find yourself in what I will call an ‘equipollent case’ with respect to some proposition p, there will be no reason why you can’t believe p at will. While doxastic involuntarism is virtually epistemological orthodoxy, nothing in the entire stock of objections to belief at will blocks this route to doxastic voluntarism. Against the backdrop of the permissivism debate and the literature on norms of belief and assertion, doxastic involuntarism emerges as an article of faith, not the obvious truth it’s usually purported to be.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROEEJA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doxastic Deliberation.Shah, Nishi & David Velleman, J.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-01-09

Total views
98 ( #28,524 of 44,304 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #17,359 of 44,304 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.