The Pragmatic Encroachment Debate

Noûs 52 (1):171-195 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Does knowledge depend in any interesting way on our practical interests? This is the central question in the pragmatic encroachment debate. Pragmatists defend the affirmative answer to this question while purists defend the negative answer. The literature contains two kinds of arguments for pragmatism: principle-based arguments and case-based arguments. Principle-based arguments derive pragmatism from principles that connect knowledge to practical interests. Case-based arguments rely on intuitions about cases that differ with respect to practical interests. I argue that there are insurmountable problems for both kinds of arguments, and that it is therefore unclear what motivates pragmatism.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-03-06
Latest version: 1 (2019-03-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
441 ( #16,895 of 69,113 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
84 ( #8,686 of 69,113 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.