How is a relational formal ontology relational? An exploration of the semiotic logic of agency in physics, mathematics and natural philosophy

Abstract

A speculative exploration of the distinction between a relational formal ontology and a classical formal ontology for modelling phenomena in nature that exhibit relationally-mediated wholism, such as phenomena from quantum physics and biosemiotics. Whereas a classical formal ontology is based on mathematical objects and classes, a relational formal ontology is based on mathematical signs and categories. A relational formal ontology involves nodal networks (systems of constrained iterative processes) that are dynamically sustained through signalling. The nodal networks are hierarchically ordered and exhibit characteristics of deep learning. Clarifying the distinction between classical and relational formal ontologies may help to clarify the role of interpretative context in physics (eg. the role of the observer in quantum theory) and the role of hierarchical nodal networks in computational simulations of learning in artificial intelligence.

Author's Profile

Timothy M. Rogers
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-23

Downloads
242 (#90,966)

6 months
197 (#19,791)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?