Philosophical Counseling and Contradictions. But you can’t allow a contradiction to stand! Why not?

In L. Amir & A. Fatic (eds.), Practicing Philosophy. Newcastle upon Tyne, Vereinigtes Königreich: Cambridge Scholars Publishing (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the issue of contradictory beliefs, particularly with regard to Philosophical Counseling: both voices from the philosophical tradition (with no claim of being exhaustive!) and concepts developed by philosophical practitioners will be considered, in order to make clear what a wide range of resources for dealing with contradictions is available to the philosopher who may wish to engage in Philosophical Counseling. Among the philosophical practitioners, we devote special consideration to Ben Mijuskovic and Gerd Achenbach, and this for two main reasons: first, because the issue of contradiction plays a central role in their concept of Philosophical Counseling and, accordingly, it is given special consideration in their writings; second, because their approaches to Philosophical Counseling are so different that by looking at them one can get an impression of the variety of the positions one can adopt in Philosophical Counseling with respect to the issue of contradiction.

Author Profiles

Donata Romizi
University of Vienna
Esther Ramharter
University of Vienna

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-28

Downloads
237 (#64,691)

6 months
112 (#36,061)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?