From punishment to universalism

Mind and Language 34 (1):59-72 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers have claimed that the folk endorse moral universalism. Some have taken the folk view to support moral universalism; others have taken the folk view to reflect a deep confusion. And while some empirical evidence supports the claim that the folk endorse moral universalism, this work has uncovered intra-domain differences in folk judgments of moral universalism. In light of all this, our question is: why do the folk endorse moral universalism? Our hypothesis is that folk judgments of moral universalism are generated in part by a desire to punish. We present evidence supporting this across three studies. On the basis of this, we argue for a debunking explanation of folk judgments of moral universalism. Our results not only further our understanding of the psychological processes underpinning folk judgments of moral universalism. They also bear on philosophical discussions of folk meta-ethics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROSFPT-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Shafer-Landau, Russ (ed.)
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Teleological Essentialism.Rose, David & Nichols, Shaun

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-08-10

Total views
140 ( #22,049 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #14,834 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.