Hypocrisy is Vicious, Value-Expressing Inconsistency

The Journal of Ethics:1-24 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Hypocrisy is a ubiquitous feature of moral and political life, and accusations of hypocrisy a ubiquitous feature of moral and political discourse. Yet it has been curiously under-theorized in analytic philosophy. Fortunately, the last decade has seen a boomlet of articles that address hypocrisy in order to explain and justify conditions on the so-called “standing” to blame (Wallace 2010; Friedman 2013; Bell 2013; Todd 2017; Herstein 2017; Roadevin 2018; Fritz and Miller 2018). Nevertheless, much of this more recent literature does not adequately address the question, “what is hypocrisy?” In this paper, I develop and defend an account of hypocrisy as vicious, value-expressing inconsistency. I show how this account solves some traditional and some novel philosophical puzzles concerning hypocrisy and affords a deeper understanding of the features of hypocrisy emphasized by other prominent accounts.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-07-01
Latest version: 2 (2020-07-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #46,644 of 55,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #23,034 of 55,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.