Justice in Epistemic Gaps: The ‘Proof Paradox’ Revisited

Philosophical Issues (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper defends the heretical view that, at least in some cases, we ought to assign legal liability based on purely statistical evidence. The argument draws on prominent civil law litigation concerning pharmaceutical negligence and asbestos-poisoning. The overall aim is to illustrate moral pitfalls that result from supposing that it is never appropriate to rely on bare statistics when settling a legal dispute.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROSJIE-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-06-06
Latest version: 2 (2021-06-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-06-06

Total views
36 ( #55,471 of 2,432,743 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #21,006 of 2,432,743 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.