The social nature of engineering and its implications for risk taking

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):147-168 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Making decisions with an, often significant, element of risk seems to be an integral part of many of the projects of the diverse profession of engineering. Whether it be decisions about the design of products, manufacturing processes, public works, or developing technological solutions to environmental, social and global problems, risk taking seems inherent to the profession. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the topic and specifically to how our understanding of engineering as a distinctive profession might affect how we should make decisions under risk. This paper seeks to remedy this, firstly by offering a nuanced account of risk and then by considering how specific claims about our understanding of engineering as a social profession, with corresponding social values and obligations, should inform how we make decisions about risk in this context
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROSTSN
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine
After Virtue.MACINTYRE, A.
Moral Luck.Williams, B. A. O. & Nagel, T.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-04-20

Total views
779 ( #2,759 of 40,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #21,310 of 40,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.