The truth about better understanding?

Erkenntnis:1-24 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The notion of understanding occupies an increasingly prominent place in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and moral theory. A central and ongoing debate about the nature of understanding is how it relates to the truth. In a series of influential contributions, Catherine Elgin has used a variety of familiar motivations for antirealism in philosophy of science to defend a non- factive theory of understanding. Key to her position are: (i) the fact that false theories can contribute to the upwards trajectory of scientific understanding, and (ii) the essential role of inaccurate idealisations in scientific research. Using Elgin’s arguments as a foil, I show that a strictly factive theory of understanding has resources with which to offer a unified response to both the problem of idealisations and the role of false theories in the upwards trajectory of scientific understanding. Hence, strictly factive theories of understanding are viable notwithstanding these forceful criticisms.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROSTTA-16
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-02-04
Latest version: 1 (2021-02-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-02-04

Total views
91 ( #42,651 of 2,427,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
91 ( #7,225 of 2,427,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.