Zeno Beach

Phronesis 65 (4):467-500 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
On Zeno Beach there are infinitely many grains of sand, each half the size of the last. Supposing Aristotle denied the possibility of Zeno Beach, did he have a good argument for the denial? Three arguments, each of ancient origin, are examined: the beach would be infinitely large; the beach would be impossible to walk across; the beach would contain a part equal to the whole, whereas parts must be lesser. It is attempted to show that none of these arguments was Aristotle’s. Indeed, perhaps Aristotle’s finitism applied to magnitude only, not plurality.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROSZB
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-03-11

Total views
156 ( #37,898 of 2,462,726 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #31,211 of 2,462,726 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.