Directed Duty, Practical Intimacy, and Legal Wronging

In Teresa Marques & Chiara Valentini (eds.), Collective Action, Philosophy, and the Law (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What is it for a duty or obligation to be directed? Thinking about paradigmatic cases such as the obligations generated by promises will take us only so far in answering this question. This paper starts by surveying several approaches for understanding directed duties, as well as the challenges they face. It turns out that shared agency features something similar to the directedness of duties. This suggests an account of directedness in terms of shared agency – specifically, in terms of the so-called practical intimacy that holds between individuals when they act together. The final section addresses a challenge to the shared agency approach posed by legal wronging in tort law.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-12-18
Latest version: 2 (2020-12-18)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
64 ( #53,108 of 64,251 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,584 of 64,251 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.