Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation

Ethics 127 (1):88-115 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Accepting a promise is normatively significant in that it helps to secure promissory obligation. But what is it for B to accept A’s promise to φ? It is in part for B to intend A’s φ-ing. Thinking of acceptance in this way allows us to appeal to the distinctive role of intentions in practical reasoning and action to better understand the agency exercised by the promisee. The proposal also accounts for rational constraints on acceptance, and the so-called directedness of promissory obligation. Finally, the proposal, conjoined with Cognitivism about intentions, addresses recent criticism of Scanlon’s expectation-based view of promissory obligation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROTIEA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Toxin Puzzle.Kavka, Gregory S.
Practical Reasoning.Harman, Gilbert

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Shared Agency.Roth, Abraham Sesshu

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-04

Total views
404 ( #10,777 of 50,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #8,473 of 50,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.