The Incompatibility Problem and Religious Pluralism Beyond Hick

Philosophy Compass 8 (5):510-522 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Religious pluralism is the view that more than one religion is correct, and that no religion enjoys a special status in relation to the ultimate. Yet the world religions appear to be incompatible. How, then, can more than one be correct? Discussions and critiques of religious pluralism usually focus on the work of John Hick, yet there are a number of other pluralists whose responses to this incompatibility problem are importantly different from Hick’s. This article surveys the solutions of Hick, Harrison, Heim, Byrne, and Knitter to the incompatibility problem. I conclude that, while none of these views is without weakness, there are several promising pluralist solutions to this problem. Moreover, confessionalists (i.e. exclusivists and inclusivists) must also address issues related to incompatibility
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUHTIP
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-04-19

Total views
2,397 ( #580 of 43,831 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
637 ( #412 of 43,831 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.