On Linguistic Evidence for Expressivism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that there is a class of terms, or uses of terms, that are best accounted for by an expressivist account. We put forward two sets of criteria to distinguish between expressive and factual terms. The first set relies on the action-guiding nature of expressive language. The second set relies on the difference between one's evidence for making an expressive vs. factual statement. We then put those criteria to work to show, first, that the basic evaluative adjectives such as ‘good’ have expressive as well as factual uses and, second, that many adjectives whose primary meanings are factual, such as ‘powerful’, also have expressive uses.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUIOLE
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-06-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-09-19

Total views
33 ( #59,111 of 2,448,391 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,497 of 2,448,391 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.