Actuality for Counterpart Theorists

Mind 122 (485):85-134 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The counterpart theorist has a problem: there is no obvious way to understand talk about actuality in terms of counterparts. Fara and Williamson have charged that this obstacle cannot be overcome. Here I defend the counterpart theorist by offering systematic interpretations of a quantified modal language that includes an actuality operator. Centrally, I disentangle the counterpart relation from a related notion, a ‘representation relation’. The relation of possible things to the actual things they represent is variable, and an adequate account of modal language must keep track of the way it is systematically shifted by modal operators. I apply my account to resolve several puzzles about counterparts and actuality. In technical appendices, I prove some important logical results about this ‘representational’ counterpart system and its relationship to other modal systems
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Counterparts and Actuality.Fara, Michael & Williamson, Timothy
The Hole Truth.Butterfield, Jeremy

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Contingent Identity.Schwarz, Wolfgang

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
226 ( #11,504 of 37,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #16,293 of 37,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.