On the Epistemology of Modal Rationalism: the Main Problems and Their Significance

Logos and Episteme 6 (1):75-94 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss the main characteristics of the epistemology of modal rationalism by proceeding from the critical investigation of Peacocke’s theory of modality. I build on arguments by Crispin Wright and Sonia Roca-Royes, which are generalised and supplemented by further analysis, in order to show that principle-based accounts have little prospects of succeeding in their task of providing an integrated account of the metaphysics and the epistemology of modality. I argue that it is unlikely that we will able to develop an exhaustive and accurate principle-based account that discriminates objectively between correct and deviant modal knowledge. Even if such an account can be formulated, a non-circular way of justifying its necessity also seems to be out of our reach.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUSOTE-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Summary.Peacocke, Christopher

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-31

Total views
197 ( #21,362 of 49,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #13,849 of 49,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.