On the Epistemology of Modal Rationalism: the Main Problems and Their Significance

Logos and Episteme 6 (1):75-94 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I discuss the main characteristics of the epistemology of modal rationalism by proceeding from the critical investigation of Peacocke’s theory of modality. I build on arguments by Crispin Wright and Sonia Roca-Royes, which are generalised and supplemented by further analysis, in order to show that principle-based accounts have little prospects of succeeding in their task of providing an integrated account of the metaphysics and the epistemology of modality. I argue that it is unlikely that we will able to develop an exhaustive and accurate principle-based account that discriminates objectively between correct and deviant modal knowledge. Even if such an account can be formulated, a non-circular way of justifying its necessity also seems to be out of our reach.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Summary.Peacocke, Christopher

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
197 ( #21,362 of 49,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #13,849 of 49,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.