On Where Things Could Be

Philosophy of Science 81 (1):60-80 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some philosophers respond to Leibniz’s “shift” argument against absolute space by appealing to antihaecceitism about possible worlds, using David Lewis’s counterpart theory. But separated from Lewis’s distinctive system, it is difficult to understand what this doctrine amounts to or how it bears on the Leibnizian argument. In fact, the best way of making sense of the relevant kind of antihaecceitism concedes the main point of the Leibnizian argument, pressing us to consider alternative spatiotemporal metaphysics
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUSOWT
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-05
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-02-05

Total views
147 ( #27,455 of 51,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #27,871 of 51,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.