Possible Worlds and the Objective World

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
David Lewis holds that a single possible world can provide more than one way things could be. But what are possible worlds good for if they come apart from ways things could be? We can make sense of this if we go in for a metaphysical understanding of what the world is. The world does not include everything that is the case—only the genuine facts. Understood this way, Lewis's “cheap haecceitism” amounts to a kind of metaphysical anti-haecceitism: it says there aren't any genuine facts about individuals over and above their qualitative roles.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUSPWA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David K.

View all 65 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Counteridenticals.Kocurek, Alexander W.
Qualitative Grounds.Russell, Jeffrey Sanford

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-07-19

Total views
432 ( #9,844 of 50,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #7,300 of 50,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.