Why It Doesn’t Matter I’m Not Insane: Descartes’s Madness Doubt in Focus

Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):157-165 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Harry Frankfurt has argued that Descartes’s madness doubt in the First Meditation is importantly different from his dreaming doubt. The madness doubt does not provide a reason for doubting the senses since were the meditator to suppose he was mad his ability to successfully complete the philosophical investigation he sets for himself in the first few pages of the Meditations would be undermined. I argue that Frankfurt’s interpretation of Descartes’s madness doubt is mistaken and that it should be understood as playing the same role as his more famous dreaming doubt. I focus my discussion around four questions: (Q1) What does the meditator have in mind when speaking of madness?, (Q2) Why does the meditator so quickly dismiss the madness doubt but take seriously the dreaming doubt?, (Q3) Does the madness doubt have the same scope as the dreaming doubt?, and (Q4) Why does the meditator bring up the madness doubt at all?
Categories
Reprint years
2012
ISBN(s)
0897-2346
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUSWID-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-05-15

Total views
3,170 ( #534 of 51,275 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
322 ( #1,016 of 51,275 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.