Dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland (
2024)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
While it is widely agreed that Hegel’s philosophy is a philosophy of freedom, the
significance and scope of Hegel’s theory of freedom is disputed. Most scholarly work on this topic
has been devoted to the socio-political philosophy of the Philosophy of Right. But Hegel also
speaks of freedom in a way which extends beyond the concerns of his socio-political thought. This
dissertation demonstrates how Hegel’s theory of freedom is more fully grasped when it is
understood as a comprehensive philosophy which also involves an ontology (a logic of being) and
a phenomenology (a direct experience of this logic). The free state which Hegel outlines in the
Philosophy of Right is still only a limited manifestation of a freedom which also pervades other
aspects of human experience. A way of thinking which is “free” (in the sense that it does not
restrict itself by assuming false methodological limitations) is itself essential to our capacity for
rational self-determination. Moreover, this “speculative” perspective has only been achieved
through the gradual cultivation (Bildung) of the free personality throughout history.
This dissertation therefore investigates why Hegel thinks that freedom is at issue in abstract
philosophical thought (in his logical works) as well as in concrete historical phenomena (in the
Phenomenology of Spirit). This logic and appearance of freedom explicates Hegel’s statement in
the Preface of the Phenomenology that the absolute is not only substance, but also subject. Having
shown that both the ancient freedom of the “social substance” and the modern freedom of the “pure
I” are untenable on their own terms, Hegel advances a logical and phenomenological theory of
freedom in which these one-sided truths are reconciled with each other. The “substantial subject”
of Hegelian freedom more fully actualizes the purely subjective freedom of the Enlightenment,
enabling true individual self-determination. Freedom appears not just as the right to make arbitrary
choices, but as substantial thought and conviction.