Rumination and Wronging: The Role of Attention in Epistemic Morality

Episteme 19 (4):491-514 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that our epistemic practices can be wrongful has been the core observation driving the growing literature on epistemic injustice, doxastic wronging, and moral encroachment. But, one element of our epistemic practice has been starkly absent from this discussion of epistemic morality: attention. The goal of this article is to show that attention is a worthwhile focus for epistemology, especially for the field of epistemic morality. After presenting a new dilemma for proponents of doxastic wronging, I show how focusing on attention not only allows us to defuse that dilemma, but also helps to substantiate accounts of what goes wrong in cases of doxastic wronging.

Author's Profile

Catharine (Cat) Saint-Croix
University of Minnesota

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-24

Downloads
690 (#20,919)

6 months
257 (#8,299)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?