Agatheology and naturalisation of the discourse on evil

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article argues that the existence of horrendous evil calls into question not just the plausibility of the most popular theodicies on offer, notably sceptical theism, but the coherence of any agatheology–that is, any theology which identifies God or the ultimate reality with the ultimate good or with a maximally good being. The article contends that the only way an agatheologian can ‘save the face of God’ after Auschwitz and Kolyma is by endorsing a non-interventionist interpretation of the Divine providence which will amount to naturalisation of the discourse on evil by localising entirely in nature the causes of evil and the possible ways of its prevention. ‘Theodicy of justice as fairness’ is then presented as consistent with such naturalistic account of evils and yet compatible with a religious worldview. It justifies the Divine non-intervention by suggesting that it would not be just or fair for God to intervene on only some occasions to avert evil, if God is apparently prevented from intervening in all such cases. Since for Agatheos it is metaphysically impossible to do what is unjust or unfair, God never intervenes to avert evil.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-02-17
Latest version: 1 (2019-01-22)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Problem of Evil.van Inwagen, Peter
God, Freedom, and Evil.Plantinga, Alvin

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #34,668 of 42,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #31,025 of 42,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.