A Dilemma for the Scientific Realist

Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):65-67 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note poses a dilemma for scientific realism which stems from the apparent conflict between science and common sense. On the one hand, we may accept scientific realism and agree that there is a conflict between science and common sense. If we do this, we remove the evidential basis for science and have no reason to accept science in the first place. On the other hand, we may accept scientific realism and endorse common sense. If we do this, we must reject the conflict between science and common sense. The dilemma is to be resolved by distinguishing between basic common sense and widely held beliefs. Basic common sense survives the advance of science and may serve as the evidential basis for science.

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-16

Downloads
297 (#50,373)

6 months
65 (#58,433)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?