Determinism, Counterfactuals, and Decision

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Rational agents face choices, even when taking seriously the possibility of determinism. Rational agents also follow the advice of Causal Decision Theory (CDT). Although many take these claims to be well-motivated, there is growing pressure to reject one of them, as CDT seems to go badly wrong in some deterministic cases. We argue that deterministic cases do not undermine a counterfactual model of rational deliberation, which is characteristic of CDT. Rather, they force us to distinguish between counterfactuals that are relevant and ones that are irrelevant for the purposes of deliberation. We incorporate this distinction into decision theory to develop ‘Selective Causal Decision Theory’, which delivers the correct recommendations in deterministic cases while respecting the key motivations behind CDT.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SANDCA-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge, Bets, and Interests.Brian Weatherson - 2012 - In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford University Press. pp. 75--103.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-06-11

Total views
81 ( #36,193 of 50,064 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #6,478 of 50,064 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.