Disappearing Diamonds: Fitch-Like Results in Bimodal Logic

Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (6):1003-1016 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Augment the propositional language with two modal operators: □ and ■. Define ⧫ to be the dual of ■, i.e. ⧫=¬■¬. Whenever (X) is of the form φ → ψ, let (X⧫) be φ→⧫ψ . (X⧫) can be thought of as the modally qualified counterpart of (X)—for instance, under the metaphysical interpretation of ⧫, where (X) says φ implies ψ, (X⧫) says φ implies possibly ψ. This paper shows that for various interesting instances of (X), fairly weak assumptions suffice for (X⧫) to imply (X)—so, the modally qualified principle is as strong as its unqualified counterpart. These results have surprising and interesting implications for issues spanning many areas of philosophy.

Author's Profile

Weng Kin San
University of Southern California

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-09

Downloads
906 (#14,041)

6 months
163 (#16,807)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?