Indeterminacy and Triviality

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Suppose that you're certain that a certain sentence, e.g. "Frida is tall", lacks a determinate truth value. What cognitive attitude should you take towards it—reject it, suspend judgment, or what else? We show that, by adopting a seemingly plausible principle connecting credence in A and Determinately A, we can prove a very implausible answer to this question: i.e., all indeterminate claims should be assigned credence zero. The result is striking similar to so-called triviality results in the literature on modals and conditionals.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-23
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
439 ( #11,561 of 55,822 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #10,472 of 55,822 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.