Methodological pluralism, normative naturalism and the realist aim of science

In Howard Sankey & Robert Nola (eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 211-229 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There are two chief tasks which confront the philosophy of scientific method. The first task is to specify the methodology which serves as the objective ground for scientific theory appraisal and acceptance. The second task is to explain how application of this methodology leads to advance toward the aim(s) of science. In other words, the goal of the theory of method is to provide an integrated explanation of both rational scientific theory choice and scientific progress.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SANMPN
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Aimless Science.Rowbottom, Darrell Patrick

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
309 ( #14,511 of 50,192 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #19,038 of 50,192 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.