Realism, method and truth

In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 64-81 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What is the relation between method and truth? Are we justified in accepting a theory that satisfies the rules of scientific method as true? Such questions divide realism from anti-realism in the philosophy of science. Scientific realists take the methods of science to promote the realist aim of correspondence truth. Anti-realists either claim that the methods of science promote lesser epistemic goals than realist truth, or else they reject the realist conception of truth altogether. In this paper, I propose a realist theory of the relation between method and truth. The theory consists of three basic elements: (a) a naturalistic treatment of epistemic normativity, (b) an instrumentalist conception of the nature of methodological rules, and (c) an abductive argument for the truth-conduciveness of the rules of scientific method.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-10-04
Latest version: 2 (2018-10-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
La relatividad conceptual y el problema de la verdad.Antonio Diéguez - 2020 - Scientia in Verba Magazine 6 (1):105-120.
Normativität und Bayesianismus.Hartmann, Stephan & Fahrbach, Ludwig

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
144 ( #27,279 of 50,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #39,119 of 50,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.