Two Kinds of Logical Impossibility

Noûs (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that a distinction ought to be drawn between two ways in which a given world might be logically impossible. First, a world w might be impossible because the laws that hold at w are different from those that hold at some other world (say the actual world). Second, a world w might be impossible because the laws of logic that hold in some world (say the actual world) are violated at w. We develop a novel way of modelling logical possibility that makes room for both kinds of logical impossibility. Doing so has interesting implications for the relationship between logical possibility and other kinds of possibility (for example, metaphysical possibility) and implications for the necessity or contingency of the laws of logic.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SANTKO-3
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-03-01
Latest version: 3 (2019-03-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-03-01

Total views
666 ( #5,938 of 52,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
167 ( #2,519 of 52,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.