Why the numbers should sometimes count

Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1):3-14 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Taurek has argued that, where choices must be made between alternatives that affect different numbers of people, the numbers are not, by themselves, morally relevant. This is because we "must" take "losses-to" the persons into account (and these don't sum), but "must not" consider "losses-of" persons (because we must not treat persons like objects). I argue that the numbers are always ethically relevant, and that they may sometimes be the decisive consideration.

Author's Profile

John T. Sanders
Rochester Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,660 (#6,496)

6 months
138 (#32,368)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?