Minor Tweaks, Major Payoffs: The Problems and Promise of Situationism in Moral Philosophy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Moral philosophers of late have been examining the implications of experimental social psychology for ethics. The focus of attention has been on situationism—the thesis that we routinely underestimate the extent to which minor situational variables influence morally significant behavior. Situationism has been seen as a threat to prevailing lay and philosophical theories of character, personhood, and agency. In this paper, I outline the situationist literature and critique one of its upshots: the admonition to carefully select one’s situational contexts. Besides being limited in application, this strategy accentuates an untenable person/situation dichotomy. The deeper lesson of situationism lies in highlighting the interconnectedness of all social behavior—how we are inextricably involved in the actions of others, and how minor tweaks in our own behavior can lead to major payoffs in our moral lives. Situationism is better seen as an opportunity for moral progress than a threat to individual autonomy
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SARMTM
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition.Nisbett, Richard E.; Peng, Kaiping; Choi, Incheol & Norenzayan, Ara

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Implicit Bias.Brownstein, Michael

View all 49 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-12-29

Total views
166 ( #23,303 of 47,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #26,598 of 47,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.