Neo-Confucianism, experimental philosophy and the trouble with intuitive methods

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe proper role of intuitions in philosophy has been debated throughout its history, and especially since the turn of the twenty-first century. The context of this recent debate within analytic philosophy has been the heightened interest in intuitions as data points that need to be accommodated or explained away by philosophical theories. This, in turn, has given rise to a sceptical movement called experimental philosophy, whose advocates seek to understand the nature and reliability of such intuitions. Yet such scepticism of intuition or introspective methods can be found in earlier periods and across philosophical traditions. Indeed, the Neo-Confucian philosophers of the Song and Ming dynasties seem to exemplify this very tension, as they can be divided into an intuitionistic school on the one hand and an investigative school on the other. In this paper, I argue that, notwithstanding some obvious d...
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SARNEP
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-03-03
Latest version: 2 (2019-03-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Experimental Philosophy.Knobe, Joshua; Buckwalter, Wesley; Nichols, Shaun; Robbins, Philip; Sarkissian, Hagop & Sommers, Tamler

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-02

Total views
81 ( #34,221 of 47,126 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #23,764 of 47,126 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.