Quine and his Critics on Truth-Functionality and Extensionality

Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (1):45-63 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Quine argues that if sentences that are set theoretically equivalent are interchangeable salva veritate, then all transparent operators are truth-functional. Criticisms of this argument fail to take into account the conditional character of the conclusion. Quine also argues that, for any person P with minimal logical acuity, if ‘belief’ has a sense in which it is a transparent operator, then, in that sense of the word, P believes everything if P believes anything. The suggestion is made that he intends that result to show us that ‘believes’ has no transparent sense. Criticisms of this argument are either based on unwarranted assertions or on definitions of key terms that depart from Quine’s usage of those terms.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.Quine, Willard Van Orman
Word and Object.Quine, Willard Van Orman

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Quine’s Poor Tom.Haze, Tristan Grøtvedt

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
462 ( #9,052 of 50,112 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #24,650 of 50,112 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.