Branching actualism and cosmological arguments

Philosophical Studies 180 (7):1951-1973 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We draw out significant consequences of a relatively popular theory of metaphysical modality—branching actualism—for cosmological arguments for God’s existence. According to branching actualism, every possible world shares an initial history with the actual world and diverges only because causal powers (or dispositions, or some such) are differentially exercised. We argue that branching actualism undergirds successful responses to two recent cosmological arguments: the Grim Reaper Kalam argument and a modal argument from contingency. We also argue that branching actualism affords a response to one popular defense of the classic contingency argument. What results are new difficulties for several cosmological arguments arising from the metaphysics of modality.

Author Profiles

Joseph Schmid
Princeton University
Alex Malpass
University of Bristol

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-04

Downloads
1,147 (#9,299)

6 months
542 (#2,182)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?