Conditionalization Does Not Maximize Expected Accuracy

Mind 126 (504):1155-1187 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Greaves and Wallace argue that conditionalization maximizes expected accuracy. In this paper I show that their result only applies to a restricted range of cases. I then show that the update procedure that maximizes expected accuracy in general is one in which, upon learning P, we conditionalize, not on P, but on the proposition that we learned P. After proving this result, I provide further generalizations and show that much of the accuracy-first epistemology program is committed to KK-like iteration principles and to the existence of a class of propositions that rational agents will be certain of if and only if they are true.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Laws and Symmetry.van Fraassen, Bas C.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
275 ( #15,927 of 48,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #20,057 of 48,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.