Computation in Physical Systems: A Normative Mapping Account

In Matteo Vincenzo D'Alfonso & Don Berkich (eds.), On the Cognitive, Ethical, and Scientific Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence. Springer Verlag. pp. 27-47 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The relationship between abstract formal procedures and the activities of actual physical systems has proved to be surprisingly subtle and controversial, and there are a number of competing accounts of when a physical system can be properly said to implement a mathematical formalism and hence perform a computation. I defend an account wherein computational descriptions of physical systems are high-level normative interpretations motivated by our pragmatic concerns. Furthermore, the criteria of utility and success vary according to our diverse purposes and pragmatic goals. Hence there is no independent or uniform fact to the matter, and I advance the ‘anti-realist’ conclusion that computational descriptions of physical systems are not founded upon deep ontological distinctions, but rather upon interest-relative human conventions. Hence physical computation is a ‘conventional’ rather than a ‘natural’ kind.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHCIP-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-01

Total views
154 ( #26,078 of 50,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #12,266 of 50,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.