Defining dysfunction: Natural selection, design, and drawing a line

Philosophy of Science 74 (3):364-385 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Accounts of the concepts of function and dysfunction have not adequately explained what factors determine the line between low‐normal function and dysfunction. I call the challenge of doing so the line‐drawing problem. Previous approaches emphasize facts involving the action of natural selection (Wakefield 1992a, 1999a, 1999b) or the statistical distribution of levels of functioning in the current population (Boorse 1977, 1997). I point out limitations of these two approaches and present a solution to the line‐drawing problem that builds on the second one.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Dennett, Daniel C.
Functional Analysis.Cummins, Robert
In Defense of Proper Functions.Millikan, Ruth Garrett
From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice.Buchanan, Allen; Brock, Dan W.; Daniels, Norman & Wikler, Daniel

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Second Rebuttal On Health.Boorse, Christopher
Medical Nihilism.Stegenga, Jacob

View all 51 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
791 ( #4,227 of 50,086 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #6,453 of 50,086 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.