Health, Disability, and Well-Being

In Guy Fletcher (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being. New York,: Routledge (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much academic work (in philosophy, economics, law, etc.), as well as common sense, assumes that ill health reduces well-being. It is bad for a person to become sick, injured, disabled, etc. Empirical research, however, shows that people living with health problems report surprisingly high levels of well-being - in some cases as high as the self-reported well-being of healthy people. In this chapter, I explore the relationship between health and well-being. I argue that although we have good reason to believe that health problems causing pain and death typically do reduce well-being, health problems that limit capabilities probably don't reduce well-being nearly as much as most people suppose. I then briefly explore the consequences of this conclusion for political philosophy and ethics. If many health problems don't significantly reduce well-being, why should governments go to great expense to prevent or treat them? Why should parents be obliged to ensure the health of their children?

Author's Profile

S. Andrew Schroeder
Claremont McKenna College

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-23

Downloads
1,104 (#13,644)

6 months
152 (#31,757)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?