Interfering with nomological necessity

Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):577-597 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Since causal processes can be prevented and interfered with, law-governed causation is a challenge for necessitarian theories of laws of nature. To show that there is a problematic friction between necessity and interference, I focus on David Armstrong's theory; with one proviso, his lawmaker, nomological necessity, is supposed to be instantiated as the causation of the law's second relatum whenever its first relatum is instantiated. His proviso is supposed to handle interference cases, but fails to do so. In order to be able to handle interferences, any theory which utilizes a kind of necessitation as lawmaker has to downgrade what it treats as necessity to something more akin to (Newtonian) forces
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Truthmakers.Armstrong, D. M.
Laws and Symmetry.van Fraassen, Bas C.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Armstrong on Probabilistic Laws of Nature.Jacobs, Jonathan D. & Hartman, Robert J.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
415 ( #10,122 of 49,004 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #13,217 of 49,004 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.