Können wir uns entscheiden, etwas zu glauben? Zur Möglichkeit und Unmöglichkeit eines doxastischen Willens

Grazer Philosophische Studien 93 (4):571-582 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that believing at will – i.e. believing for practical reasons – is in some sense possible and in some sense impossible. It is impossible insofar as we think of belief formation as a re-sult of our exercise of certain capacities (perception, memory, agency). But insofar as we think of belief formation as an action that might lead to such a result (i.e. a deliberation or an in-quiry), believing at will is possible. First I present and clarify the problem and its philosophical relevance (section 1). I then argue that a belief formation as an immediate reaction to practical reasons is not necessarily equivalent to believing at will because the causal mechanism that leads to the formation might be deviant (section 2). Finally, I explain the difference between the two above mentioned meanings of “belief formation” in order to clarify the possibility and impossibility of believing at will (section 3).
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Paradoxien der Autonomie. Freiheit Und Gesetz I.Khurana, Thomas & Menke, Christoph (eds.)

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
185 ( #22,425 of 49,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #12,250 of 49,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.