Stage One of the Aristotelian Proof: A Critical Appraisal

Sophia 60 (4):781-796 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


What explains change? Edward Feser argues in his ‘Aristotelian proof’ that the only adequate answer to these questions is ultimately in terms of an unchangeable, purely actual being. In this paper, I target the cogency of Feser’s reasoning to such an answer. In particular, I present novel paths of criticism—both undercutting and rebutting—against one of Feser’s central premises. I then argue that Feser’s inference that the unactualized actualizer lacks any potentialities contains a number of non-sequiturs.

Author's Profile

Joseph Schmid
Princeton University


Added to PP

3,150 (#1,835)

6 months
553 (#1,844)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?