Small Tumors as Risk Factors not Disease

Philosophy of Science 81 (5):986-998 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the tumor most commonly diagnosed by breast mammography, cannot be confidently classified as cancer, that is, as pathological. This is because there may not be dysfunction present in DCIS—as I argue based on its high prevalence and the small amount of risk it conveys—and thus DCIS may not count as a disease by dysfunction-requiring approaches, such as Boorse’s biostatistical theory and Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction account. Patients should decide about treatment for DCIS based on the risks it poses and the risks and benefits of treatment, not on its disease status
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHSTA-13
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-07-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-11-27

Total views
207 ( #28,817 of 2,445,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #52,507 of 2,445,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.