Simply Unsuccessful: The Neo-Platonic Proof of God’s Existence

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):129-156 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Edward Feser defends the ‘Neo-Platonic proof ’ for the existence of the God of classical theism. After articulating the argument and a number of preliminaries, I first argue that premise three of Feser’s argument—the causal principle that every composite object requires a sustaining efficient cause to combine its parts—is both unjustified and dialectically ill-situated. I then argue that the Neo-Platonic proof fails to deliver the mindedness of the absolutely simple being and instead militates against its mindedness. Finally, I uncover two tensions between Trinitarianism and the Neo-Platonic proof.

Author's Profile

Joseph Schmid
Princeton University


Added to PP

2,565 (#2,835)

6 months
690 (#1,685)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?